Part Two
Anita Susuri: Mr. Skender, I would also like to ask you about the day the protest took place. What do you remember from the beginning to the end?
Skender Muçolli: On that day, according to the tasks assigned to us as members of the team that organized the 1968 events, I was personally responsible for preparing the banners, writing them and shaping them, together with Ilaz Pireva and Selatin Novosella.
At the designated moment, time, and place, the three of us transported the banners using a horse-drawn cart. Selatin Novosella led in front of the cart, while Ilaz Pireva and I followed behind it. I remember the route, which had been predetermined. For security reasons, we changed the route…
Anita Susuri: The direction, yes.
Skender Muçolli: The direction and the path. Because it was thought that if the banners or the cart carrying them were intercepted, everything would be ruined, cut short, and there would be nothing to present at the demonstration. Without banners, the protest would be empty.
So we succeeded in changing the route and direction. At the designated moment, we arrived at the target location and distributed everything there within five minutes, less than five minutes. The entire cart was emptied immediately. It was, of course, a horse-drawn cart, about three meters long and one and a half meters wide. How many banners were there? Around one hundred pieces. I don’t recall the exact number anymore. All of them were taken, and the demonstration began.
We also had national flags and flags on poles, and then it began. From the courtyard of the Faculty of Philosophy, from the yard where the National Library is today, in front of Radio Prishtina, that courtyard, that square. Right where the library stands today, that’s where it started, and we moved out to the main street. We turned right and marched toward the city center.
The center at that time was where the monument of Zahir Pajaziti stands today, where the Skanderbeg monument is, near the theater. That was Pristina. The route was led by our members, and the crowd of students and the general population joined them, thousands of people, until late in the evening that day.
Anita Susuri: Do you remember when the police started to arrive?
Skender Muçolli: The police reacted from the very start. As soon as the banners and flags appeared openly on the main street, that’s where the first resistance from the police began, including shots fired. But of course, the shots were fired into the air, mainly to alert other police units that weapons had been used, or to frighten us. But the crowd continued forward.
It was around four o’clock, a few minutes before four, when it began. Within about an hour, in November, dusk had fallen. The main part of the march, up to the city center, took place while it was still light; later the darkness covered that part. The police acted mostly by trying to disperse the crowd, but they didn’t manage to break it up until late at night. In other words, the action, this form of protest, this form of demonstration, was carried out till the end, just as we had planned. It went on until the early hours of the morning.
Anita Susuri: Was there violence from the police?
Skender Muçolli: Violence, yes, it escalated. With the fall of dusk, there was more gunfire, there were gunshot wounds, there were deaths. One of my students, Murat Mehmeti, a martyr of that time, died from gunshot wounds. Many others were injured, nearly 30 people wounded either by firearms or in other ways.
The activity, or protest, in this form took place at the same time in Besiana [then Podujeva], led by Xheladin Rekaliu, Akif Sheholli, Sabit Syla, Ahmet Abdullahu, and others. In Ferizaj, the demonstrations were led by Ismet Ramadani, Hasan Abazi, and the Sulejmani brothers. In Gjilan, by Asllan Kastrati, Irfan Shaqiri, and Rexhep Mala, who was then a student, as part of the same wave.
Anita Susuri: When you planned to organize all this, what did you think you were going to achieve? Did you initially think it would succeed?
Skender Muçolli: Of course. The essence of this was opposition, resistance to the occupier, which at that time we considered Yugoslavia to be. It was a form of protest, an articulation that Kosovo, or the Albanians of Kosovo, had their own views and did not agree with the regime, with the occupation of Kosovo. This was, for us, the most recent occupation, since there had been other ones before. Kosovo had been occupied in 1912 by Serbia, under the monarchy. Then came socialism after the Second World War. So, in that sense, this was our way to say something against all of that.
Anita Susuri: At that time, in 1968, there were also arrests, and you said that you too were arrested in 1968.
Skender Muçolli: Yes.
Anita Susuri: How did that happen? Where were you?
Skender Muçolli: As I said, the form of organization was legal in nature, and our activity was not 100% illegal, nor 100% legal. It was semi-illegal, but much more on the legal side, so to speak. All this was done so that our demands would be articulated publicly, not in secret, that the whole world would know there is a population here that is seeking forms of independence. Of course, the regime closely followed events; there were no major pre-emptive arrests to prevent the demonstrations. Perhaps there had been some investigations, but they had no effect in stopping such an event.
After the demonstrations, the arrests began. The individuals were identified and arrested with heavy sentences: nine people in Pristina, three in Podujeva, three in Gjilan, four in Ferizaj. Sentences ranged from one year to five years of hard prison. The sentences were served later across various parts of Yugoslavia, not in Kosovo: in Niš, Mitrovica e Sremit, Pozharevc, Idrizovo in Macedonia, Goli Otok, Lepoglava, Gradiška in Croatia, Foča near Sarajevo. They were scattered everywhere.
I, together with a group of comrades, served time in Niš. The prison in Niš is quite a large facility, at the entrance to the city, it still exists there. The others served in the places I mentioned, all over Yugoslavia. Even in Goli Otok there was a group from Podujeva. That’s how we were dispersed everywhere by the repressive measures of that time.
Anita Susuri: And when they caught you, was it during the demonstrations or afterward?
Skender Muçolli: No, I had been wounded by a gunshot, and in that condition, wounded, someone took me to the hospital.
Anita Susuri: Where were you shot? Where were you wounded?
Skender Muçolli: Somewhere near today’s Zahir Pajaziti Square, in that area, in the chest. In that condition, wounded, they took me to the hospital. I was admitted to the hospital.
The next day, directly, without an investigator [questioning me], the investigative judge came and told me, “You are under arrest,” without interrogating me, without anything. I was lying there in the hospital. They brought me a police guard, and he guarded me the entire time I was in the hospital. I stayed in the Pristina hospital for about three weeks. They didn’t operate on me, they couldn’t remove [the bullet] in that sense, that was the doctor’s statement. After that, I was sent straight to prison.
That’s how the arrest happened, from the hospital… Arrested in the hospital, and when I was discharged from there, they took me to the investigative judge, who then issued the detention order. In that classic way, with pre-trial detention and so on…
Anita Susuri: From the hospital they sent you to Niš?
Skender Muçolli: No, I stayed in Pristina. I’m talking about Pristina now, because Niš came after the trial. Once the verdict became final, one day we were transferred, I remember after about four months or so, to Niš Prison together with Afrim Loxha. We were chained together on the train, escorted by the police…
Anita Susuri: By train.
Skender Muçolli: By train, there was no highway at that time. I remember the morning train; before dawn, before five o’clock, we arrived in Niš. It was June, I remember June. From there, we were taken directly to the prison. And in prison, things are as you’d expect…
Anita Susuri: And here in Pristina, how long did the investigation last?
Skender Muçolli: The investigation in Pristina lasted until the trial, from November, actually late November–December, until April, until April of the following year, 1969.
Anita Susuri: Mr. Skender, you said that from the hospital they took you straight to the Investigative prison in Pristina. How was that first arrival there, did you have interrogations, informational interviews? Was there violence? How was it?
Skender Muçolli: As soon as I arrived in prison from the hospital, the investigative procedure began in parallel: on one side by the state security service of that time, and in parallel by the judicial investigation. The state security part was carried out by specific officers of the State Security Service. I had as an interrogator a former teacher from Peja, named Hajri Gjoda. Coincidentally, he had been Afrim Loxha’s primary school teacher in Peja. At that time, Afrim Loxha was also under investigation. He had been assigned to handle the investigative file for both me and Afrim Loxha. He was a teacher.
One of his key questions, or persistent points, as a former teacher, was this: that the answers we gave him, and which the late Afrim Loxha stated, were that we had learned the lessons of organizing the 1968 events from our teachers. That implied that the first inspirations for patriotism came from our teachers. The former teacher should understand that. Coincidentally, another interrogator sometimes assisted, someone our family in the village knew. I had also had him as a language teacher, my Albanian language teacher. So our answers always went in that direction: that we didn’t learn from anyone else, but from the teachers, teachers like you, we would say.
All this was with the purpose of softening any potential violence. So aside from psychological pressure, which is automatic when you’re under arrest and are being interrogated by state security and police. That in itself is psychological violence, the physical pressure was mostly the hardship of prison conditions. Life in prison is hard; that too can be called a form of violence.
As for any “classic” physical torture, there was none. I don’t recall that there was. Perhaps other comrades, in some cases, experienced more specific types of violence. But for myself, that is how the investigation period passed.
Anita Susuri: During the investigation, I wanted to ask, did you have contact with your family? Were you allowed visits?
Skender Muçolli: I think, if I remember correctly, not for about a month, maybe more. After about a month, they obtained permission from the investigative judge. The investigative judge was simultaneously conducting his own questioning, in parallel with the state security.
A certain Riza Fazliu, at that time, did not insist on aggravating the situation; he did not push harder. Later he became president of the Supreme Court of Kosovo. He was also active in sports, chairman of the boxing club Prishtina at that time. What distinguished him from the main judge who announced the verdict and sentenced us, Nazmi Juniku.
Nazmi Juniku was stricter, harsher, and he sometimes took part in the interrogations with the investigative judge. That was “normal:” the future presiding judge of the panel could participate in the investigation. But the case goes to him and he decides according to his own judgment. That’s where we saw the difference between Riza Fazliu, as investigative judge, and Nazmi Juniku; Riza was much more positive. Later I don’t know how his activity ended, how the system of Kosovo’s autonomy functioned, that’s known. Maybe someone will research these things in more detail someday, their activities, their contributions, both bad and good, of these people.
Anita Susuri: If you could describe for us a bit: the Pristina Prison, for example, what were the cells like? The conditions? The food?
Skender Muçolli: Every two weeks they brought us food parcels from home. Food at that time was prepared in a primitive way, brought in big pots. We had some metal plates. They’d bring the pot to the cell door, and two prisoners would hold it at the door and ladle out the food like that. There were four of us in a room. Twice a day we were taken out for personal needs, in the morning and in the evening.
The room was small, with four beds. A room of about two and a half by three meters, let’s say. There was no running water, nothing. For personal needs you could knock on the door. If the guard approved your request, he’d let you out; if not…
We had half an hour of outdoor walking, in the prison yard, a small yard. One by one, all the cells took turns. Each cell had its own slot. The yard was divided into two sections. Two parts of the yard. One cell in this part, another cell in the other part. Like that, in halves and halves, until evening, depending on how many cells there were.
The cellblock was in an elliptical, circular shape. The corridor ran around, and the cells were on the inside. You could never really orient yourself to know where east was or where west was. You were always walking in circles, and that circular layout would make you lose your sense of direction, you didn’t know where you were. It took a long time to learn, to figure out which point connected to which.
There were prisoners who had been there four or five years and could tell, just by the sound of the door opening or the creak, which side of the building it was. For us, in a short time, one month, two months, three months, it was very hard to figure out. They had been there for years, and you couldn’t. It was a kind of psychological pressure, a mental violence, being inside there.
Anita Susuri: When you went to trial, were you in a large group?
Skender Muçolli: The group of accused, the Pristina group, had its own trial. The Gjilan group had theirs, Ferizaj their own, and Podujeva its own. Of course, the trials were conducted in coordination with the center in Pristina. The Pristina Court made its decision and sentenced us from three to five years, according to how the judge classified it in his own mind, this one this much, that one that much—three, five.
Elsewhere, in Ferizaj, Podujeva, and Gjilan, they handed down sentences like one year, a year and a half. So it went. Tetovo had its own trial in Macedonia. In other parts of Kosovo, like Prizren, some people got one month for misdemeanors; in Peja, also around a month or so. There were some high school students demonstrations there, but they were not organized by the Pristina center. The Pristina center had those main points: Ferizaj, Gjilan, Podujeva.
Anita Susuri: You were sentenced to three or four?
Skender Muçolli: Three years, yes.
Anita Susuri: And you said they sent you to Niš.
Skender Muçolli: To Niš, yes. I served that part of the sentence in Niš. Then we were released and…
Anita Susuri: And in Niš, how was it?
Skender Muçolli: In Niš…Niš was a central prison at that time. The building was from the Austro–Hungarian period. It was designed, built as a prison. As far as I know, it dates from the Austro–Hungarian time, not to say maybe even from Ottoman times, the Ottoman Empire period, but I don’t think so, I think it was Austro–Hungarian. The architectural style: long corridors, with two big rooms on each side, each with 70–80 people. A corridor to the right and left, and a crosswise corridor as well. Like this {shows with hands horizontally and straight}, so it formed a T.
Anita Susuri: Like a plus sign?
Skender Muçolli: Like the letter T. From above, a T. Two rooms this way, two rooms that way, and two rooms ahead. On the second floor. It was two stories, maybe even three, I don’t remember now. If I had a photo, I’d know right away whether it was two or three. Around 70–80 people per hall, arranged by age. I remember that those under 22 years old, 18–22, were in one wing; those older were elsewhere. There were ordinary prisoners there, murder, theft, assault, fraud, spread across the rooms, of course. And there were also people sentenced for political activities. There were Albanians with sentences of around 17–18 years. The longest sentence I saw was 20 years.
Anita Susuri: Do you remember if there was anyone there from earlier political events?
Skender Muçolli: Yes, yes, yes.
Anita Susuri: Who was there?
Skender Muçolli: There was, at that time, a Lushtaku from Drenica if I remember correctly. He was from the time of Shaban Polluzha’s activities, the patriot and fighter from Drenica, someone from that circle. Then there were some people connected to the reforms, to the reorganization of the Ballists, like a certain Baba Ukë from near Banja of Peja, I remember that Baba Ukë.
I remember an old man, all bones and skin, he had served 17 years in prison, at that time, a record. Seventeen years, wow! 15 or 17. They called him Hetem Loxha, by the village name. He was very sweet-tongued, very warm with people. He was around 20 when he was imprisoned; I was 19. He had already served 17 years. You understand the difference. I met that Hetem again, the old man, after prison.
Anita Susuri: Is he still alive?
Skender Muçolli: No, he’s not alive. Hetem Ademaj. That category of prisoners, let’s say, for patriotic causes, in one way.
Anita Susuri: How did you spend your time in prison, for example?
Skender Muçolli: In prison, the organization was like this: there was a furniture factory there, working with wood; there was a foundry for iron and iron products. There was also a factory for producing Deligrad boilers. All the prisoners were obliged to work. They rotated, either in the foundry or on boiler parts. That’s how life went there. Somebody worked in the kitchen equipment shop, somebody in the laundry, somebody in the infirmary. It depended on your skills.
If you were a technician or a medical student, you could go there. There was a guy from Pristina, Ismet Berisha, he was there for other offenses, he had gone to prison young. He worked as a medical technician and helped all of us with medicines. There, you could get medical rest and be excused from work. Early in the morning, in the dark, you had to be at the worksite, however you felt, carrying your bread with you. You’d return after noon, take a walk in the yard. Once a month, you had visits.
Anita Susuri: Was it difficult for your family to come all the way there?
Skender Muçolli: Naturally. By train, by car once people started buying cars in those years, the late ’60s, if someone from the family had one. But mostly they came by train. My father was still alive then; he came to visit me.
Anita Susuri: And at that time, were you engaged or married?
Skender Muçolli: No, no, I wasn’t at that time. And that’s how that period passed.