Part Two
Anita Susuri: I am interested to know how your arrest happened. Did they come to get you at your house, or how did they find you?
Enver Dugolli: Yes, they came to my house. To my house because I was already exposed at the demonstrations, I was exposed, I had gone out, I had climbed on top of the vehicle, I read [the letter], I read the appeal for demonstrations, the call for demonstrations. In some way, the demonstration identified with me as a leader, and I was certainly expecting they would come to arrest me. But, I didn’t see it as reasonable to leave, to run away, to leave the country. Another reason for that is that I was thinking, since my big brother was present in the demonstrations, I was thinking if I left, then they would’ve taken him. So, I consciously accepted that they would arrest me, but I never contemplated if I should stay or leave.
So, after two years, on the 4th, April 4, 1981, they came to my house and arrested me. And we were planning to, we tried to organize another demonstration on March 3, but it was impossible because there was a state siege. In some way, Drenas, Gllogoc was totally blocked, there was no way to enter or leave the city.
Anita Susuri: And then you mentioned that they brought you to Pristina’s prison, right?
Enver Dugolli: Yes.
Anita Susuri: What was it like there?
Enver Dugolli: When they sent me to Pristina’s prison since they held me in Drenas for two days, they treated me very horribly, although I was very young, I was 18. I can’t think of more arrogant, harsh, and brutal behavior from the police, although all of them were Albanian. Some of them solidarized with us, and they were affected somehow by their colleagues’ behavior, but they were totally powerless to change anything about the situation. So, I am not saying it was all of them, more than half of them were good people who loved the country, although they had militia uniforms at the time. But, some of them were really harsh, really aggressive, brutal, and they… it’s a very bad stain for them, but for Drenas as well.
Because after I was in prison, I met other people who had experienced and organized demonstrations. When I told them what happened in Drenas, which was ethnically unmixed, there were no Serbs in Gllogoc, they were shocked. They wondered how it was possible. For example, in Lipjan where half [of the population] were Serbs and half Albanians, there were no mistreatments like that. And in some other places where… I guess in other places where there were more ethnicities, they were more focused on preserving their essence as Albanians and not behaving in an unnecessary manner. Because of their brutal release against the students, against the youth, for no reason, only a release of rancor since we had demonstrated, it was totally unacceptable.
We went to court, and they made us a group, a group of eleven people. They made us a group in order to seemingly sentence us more. I barely knew anyone in the group, they were all people who took part in the demonstrations, but I had no connection to them. Although every action I did was public and I couldn’t hide, I had to accept it, “I simply went out to demonstrate for Kosovo to be a Republic and I don’t regret it.” I even remember a moment in prison before we were sentenced, the investigative judge came, and to be honest with you, I was young, 18 years old, and I had no idea what an investigative judge was or what a judge or prosecutor was, I didn’t care about it at all.
He introduced himself and came to the prison to get my statement. When I finished my statement, he asked, “Do you regret what you did?” I said, “What?” He thought I didn’t understand the question. He asked, “Do you regret it?” I said, “No, no, I understand what you’re asking. But, what is there to regret?” I said, “Why should I regret it?” He said, “Well, what you did.” I said, “Well, I did good,” I said, “I asked for Kosovo to be a Republic,” I said, “Kosovo as a Republic is good for you too. Do you not support that?” He started laughing and said, “I am here to question you, not the other way around.” He was an investigative judge, Ymer Rosaj was his name. I don’t know where he is or what he does now, but I remember we had that conversation.
And then during the trial, after the interrogating, after that procedure, let’s call it formal, they apparently had already decided the sentences. They brought many witnesses so they could tell I was leading the demonstration and read the appeal. And I told them, “Why are you bothering these witnesses, I am admitting it myself. There’s no need for you to prove it, I am admitting that I read the letter, the appeal for demonstrations. I went to the demonstrations, I don’t regret it.” And by the end, there was an unpleasant situation for me, since they apparently had instilled fear in a big part of that group of eleven people, and they began claiming that they didn’t know what was happening, “They forced us,” and stuff like that.
I started to feel bad, and before the procedure of statements and the verdict ended, I raised my hand and said, “I want to say one last thing.” He said, “Well, it’s over,” the judge, it was Isak Nishevci. I said, “No, it’s not over because I have the right to say one last thing,” “Okay,” he said, “what do you have to say?” I said, “I only want it,” I said, “to be documented that every action I took, I did it consciously. Nobody forced me, nobody made me. And I feel pretty good and satisfied that my work will at least influence Kosovo becoming a Republic a little bit, the demand for Kosovo to become a Republic.” They were somehow stunned because I was young, and they didn’t expect that statement. “Sit down,” and I remember the situation that arose even now. The prosecutor, it was Nijazi Burgideva, she had some thick glasses, and looked like this {pretends he’s lowering his glasses}. She was shocked by my answer and my age I guess and [she said,] “Sit down!” I sat down.
They came back ten minutes after they left the court and they announced the verdict. I was sentenced to eleven years, four of us in that group were sentenced to eleven years. And then, but it didn’t bother me at all to be honest, I was young and I was prepared that they would sentence me. But, when you saw all those people in prisons, professors, students, youth, there was somehow no place for sadness there. I was simply feeling proud that I was able to face the consequences at that age. And then the second instance of the Supreme Court, apparently, the prosecutor asked for my sentence to be reduced, since I was 18 years old and was sentenced to eleven years. And they reduced my sentence to six years. Six years. And then I served six years until the end.
Anita Susuri: Was all of it in Pristina’s prison?
Enver Dugolli: No, no, they transferred me to Peja’s prison. From Peja to Niš’s prison, and then I served the rest of it there.
Anita Susuri: Can you tell us about the experience you had in these prisons? I know that each prison has a set of their own rules, they have some… if you could tell us more about your experience.
Enver Dugolli: Well, prisons are almost the same by principle. Restriction of movement and deprivation of the right to be free, but then prisons differ. There are prisons with better conditions, some have it worse, some have it a lot worse. But the staff, the guards and leaders differ as well. Some were more gentle, for example in Peja’s prison, when it came to the guards and leaders of the prison, you merely were aware that you were in prison, since they were really friendly with us. Ekrem Kryeziu’s brother was the prison director, Fuad Kryeziu, a very good man, he was the prison director. And he didn’t allow anyone to mistreat us, he respected us a lot.
But, I can’t say this about Pristina’s prison. For example, most of the guards in Pristina’s prison were very harsh, they had bad attitudes. The ones who were nice were only a few in number, since there were Serbian guards as well. There were more and apparently even the ones who were nice didn’t dare to expose themselves, since we were declared as state enemies. It was like that. And then in Niš’s prison, I was very isolated. I was isolated for four years and a half. Isolation referred to the pavilion where you had only 20 minutes a day to go out for a walk, and the rest was inside the cell.
But, at that time, I used that time mostly to read. I read a lot. We had a library there and they gave us books every two weeks, so four of us were in a cell and we would take four books. A book for each and I can say that that is the time when I read the most…
Anita Susuri: Were you allowed to read books in Albanian in Niš’s prison?
Enver Dugolli: Yes, I am talking about the one in Niš, since they didn’t allow us in the prison we were in during investigations.
Anita Susuri: I think the cells were really small in Pristina’s prison…
Enver Dugolli: Yes.
Anita Susuri: What were the cells like?
Enver Dugolli: The cells were small. When they brought me from Gllogoc, the cell was a little bigger at the beginning and I remember they took me there during the night. When I entered it, it was, how to put it, terrible. There were so many people, they were all somehow lying down to sleep, but they covered the whole floor. There was almost no space to even sleep on your side, since it was full of people. And I stayed there for about seven or eight days. Because they would bring them, they had no space to accommodate the prisoners they would arrest every day. That room was full, we were above 30 people, which is bizarre to think, how could a room accommodate 30 people.
The conditions were really difficult, bad, there was no toilet inside. There was a bucket where we even had to… the smell, the humidity, everything was terrible. And then they sent me to Gjilan’s prison, and it was like that…
Anita Susuri: How long did you have to stay in Pristina? In Pristina’s prison?
Enver Dugolli: Yes, I stayed in Pristina for around three or four months. But, after, in the second prison, it’s a different one, I came back to Pristina again.
Anita Susuri: Did you have the right to receive visits? I’m sure you did, but what was that like and how long could the visits last?
Enver Dugolli: The visits were done by the family’s request to the investigative judge. And the investigative or the procedure judge, what are they called, would give the permission for visits. The visits were very short, about ten minutes and sometimes maybe even less. Through the bars, the bars were very frequent and you couldn’t see the person, the family member who came to visit you that well. No physical contact, only through [the bars], you could hear their voice and see them. But, not that well since the bars were very frequent.
Anita Susuri: I am interested to know about the physical violence, was there violence only in the beginning or was it continuous?
Enver Dugolli: In prison, there are two periods. There’s two periods known for physical violence. The first one is during investigations, that violence is unimaginable and in some way the most terrible one. Since at the time you’re in the hands of the secret service, like UDBA was, which facilitated the whole investigation. Even though, officially, it’s the prosecution who facilitates the investigations. But at the time, but also later, it was UDBA who facilitated that whole process. And in order to get as much information as possible, which they could later use for accusations, they used violence. Wherever they suspected they could get something out of, to deconstruct even more, [for people] to admit to even more acts, whatever they suspected. And then they would somehow tie you to those acts.
That period is terrible, it’s a story of its own, which… interrogations usually happened in the evening. In the evening when everything was calm and they didn’t want to bother the UDBA offices which were in Pristina’s prison. But, the next phase lasts till the end of the sentence, depending on the guards and their moods. Simply put, there were guards and prison leaders who just wanted to punish you. But, that happened and they all qualified as breach of order.
Anita Susuri: I am interested to know about the time period after prison, what did you do after? Did you continue your political activity, or did you continue school? What happened after?
Enver Dugolli: Yes, after the second prison, after I got released from Niš’s prison, for some time there was really a great need to help my family and contribute with my work. To bring income to my family because my family had suffered economically. I mentioned earlier that my father was close to retirement, he had four more years to go. He was forced to… they forced him to quit his job. So his work friends got together and… they made him leave his job. So his work friends got together and gathered the money to buy him four more years of work experience so he could get a pension, since they aimed to leave him without a pension too. So, the only income the family had was my father’s pension. Add to it that we were a big family and there was a lot of spending. We didn’t have farming lands, we didn’t have farming land. Our only income was that pension.
The spending made to host the people who visited were very big for the family budget. So, seeing my family’s situation and being aware that they suffered a lot economically, I somehow felt obliged, morally, to give back to my family and to work something. And I did manual labor, because… it was impossible to find a [different] job somewhere. I was an enemy of the state, I was isolated, I was followed everywhere. So, the only work I could do was manual labor. And I had to go far away, to Zagreb, [and] to Slovenia, in Ljubljana. So these were the places where I had to go to work. Since it was far away and they were big cities so I wouldn’t be followed as much.
So for some time, I did manual labor and made an income for my family. And then I returned to Kosovo. I started to learn the craft of construction, I became a workman without ever being one [before] and I worked with construction. In the meantime I enrolled to continue high school, remotely. I finished high school too because after the ‘90s, that pressure we had from the system loosened up somehow. With the parallel system1 of the education that was organized, I was able to, since before that you couldn’t even think about it because I was punished. I was an enemy of the state and that happened after the citizens, the people of Kosovo somehow said no to Serbia’s measures about the revocation of our autonomy and there was some kind of unification among citizens, of Albanians, the general population. And the education began to function again in some way, it was a parallel system but it happened everywhere in Kosovo.
Anita Susuri: Did you also enroll in university at that time?
Enver Dugolli: No. I didn’t at the time because as I said I somehow decided to financially contribute to my family. We were a big family and I didn’t manage to handle a worsened economical situation, I somehow felt it was my obligation. At that time I also met my wife, Sherife, we started dating and we got engaged.
Anita Susuri: Was it a problem for her or her family that you were in prison or that you were engaged in political activities?
Enver Dugolli: It was a very big problem. At the time when I met her, it was a big problem, since it was that most difficult period of time when there were people who were still seen as state enemies. And I met my wife right at that time and they were a persecuted family. Her [paternal] uncle was Fazli Grajçevci, and as a family, they had suffered from the regime, and they were familiar with the punishments and the isolation of the state, but also from society. Even though there was opposition, it seems like in the end, that feeling of love dominated. So we weren’t even thinking about turning back or not deciding to be together and date.
So, that was also the moment we began to create a family, we got married but were always in a difficult financial situation, and also politically speaking. When I met my wife, among other things, I also wanted to make sure to let her know that my path was very challenging and it would continue to be because I wouldn’t give up on political activities. So, my patriotic and political engagements. So I told her that, at the very least, I could be imprisoned again, but I could also be killed. But she accepted those conditions too.
In 1997, what I had warned her about being imprisoned again happened. So, as a result of my engagements and my involvement with the LKÇK organization, The Movement for the National Liberation of Kosovo, as a member. I was caught, uncovered, and I still don’t know how. But, very early in the morning, on January 27, 1997, they came and surrounded my whole family. All our houses and apparently the neighborhood too…
Anita Susuri: You were still in the village?
Enver Dugolli: Yes, in the village. I was in the village. And they arrested me.
Anita Susuri: I am interested to know, what were the activities you did in that organization?
Enver Dugolli: The activities in that organization were raising awareness of the citizens, for the people regarding combat organization, to organize the liberation war, which means it was to agitate them. To talk to people, to prepare them that the only way left to liberate was the armed one of war for liberation. Because I had convinced myself early on that you can’t liberate the place through pacifistic methods. At first, it seemed to me that there was some sort of euphoria, and the people agreed on one solution for Kosovo, for the Republic of Kosovo. But, as time passed by, you could tell that it didn’t bring results, I mean, the pacifist methods didn’t bring results. There was a need for active resistance. And above all, I thought that the only way left was the way of the liberation war.
My entire engagement, my focus, and the organization’s [focus] was to mobilize people, to contact people, and to raise awareness among people because we had to prepare and fight for our country because there was no other way. As part of the activities, we also distributed slogans, we distributed posters, we also distributed newspapers of the time and we were interested to find supply lines for weapons, to gather tools that we would need during war. But, I was caught, I was caught before making that specific step to organize ourselves into combat formations, and I was imprisoned on… on January 27, 1997.
Anita Susuri: Where did they imprison you? Were you at home?
Enver Dugolli: At home, at home.
Anita Susuri: And they sent you to…?
Enver Dugolli: At first in Drenas and then in Pristina’s prison. They did the investigations at Pristina’s prison, and then they sent me to Lipjan’s prison, there were investigations there too. Until they sent me back to Pristina’s prison and that’s where the verdict was made, and they sent me to Dubrava’s prison from there, where I stayed for two to three months, in ‘98. After the KLA’s2 glorious war, after Adem Jashari was killed, after his fall, and his family’s fall, and the events that happened in Drenica, they transferred us to Sremska Mitrovica’s prison around April. They kept us there with a group of friends, we were there for about a year. And when the bombings began, they sent us from Sremska Mitrovica’s prison to Niš’s prison. We were in Niš for three days, then they sent us to Dubrava from Niš’s prison. So, that’s where the Dubrava massacre happened, at Dubrava’s prison.