Part Three
Anita Susuri: I’m interested now, when you were at the gymnasium, how did it happen that you were removed? What was that day like? How do you remember it? How did it come to that day?
Xhafer Ismaili: I’ll focus more on another aspect than the ones usually explained, like how we worked in house-schools, in private homes in the villages. We worked in Turiçec, in Likovc, in Rezallë, in the two Klinas, in Vorinik, we worked there. But the generosity shown by the villagers, those who gave up their homes, is unforgettable. Honestly, I would have written on their homes: House of resistance, House of endurance. Because they passed the test. Being the school’s pedagogue, I wasn’t that focused on where exactly lessons were being held, aside from the ones I was personally involved with.
I had another preoccupation. I was concerned with how we should organize the teaching process in the occupied schools. In fact, I wrote an article at that time, the daily Bujku was still being published, titled: “How to Rationalize the Teaching Work in Occupied Schools.” That was the title, it was a long article. Because that was the real problem, not just for my school. The article was a message to all schools: how we should rationalize our work, because we didn’t have the facilities we once had. We didn’t have the same schools anymore, or the same teaching hours. Everything was reduced, and we had to reduce the curriculum, reduce the lessons, and reduce our overall work.
We had to ask for help. First, from the Pedagogical Department, which was the main hub of educational staff. Then from other institutions, from the Pedagogical Institute, we had to seek help. We also had to ask for help from the parents. There had to be greater cooperation with parents. We had to tell the parents: “Whatever your children can’t achieve in school, continue at home. What’s left half-done, complete it at home.” We had to reduce lesson units, teaching activities, and even the school hours. That was my main concern. My primary concern was: how to rationalize our teaching with students in occupied schools.
My voice was being heard. They also made changes to the curriculum. They removed a lot of lesson units. They removed almost all of the literature. The ones from Albania, you weren’t allowed to even look at them anymore. I remember we held a meeting about what they called core subjects, shared curriculum cores. This was held at the Sami Frashëri school. All of us, together. I stood up and said, “You planned everything, music and all, but not a single Albanian song or dance. We are Albanians.” One person stood up, I don’t want to mention names because I don’t want to hurt anyone. But if it ever comes to it, really comes to it, then names can be mentioned.
He said, “The Albanian language is good enough. We have plenty in Albanian. Serbian is in bad shape.” “Why is Serbian in bad shape?” He said, “Because anyone can teach Serbian now, just go to a bookstore, buy an index, register for Serbo-Croatian, and start teaching Serbo-Croatian.”
Then he expressed himself in Serbian, he said: (speaks Serbian) “The time has come to mourn for the Serbo-Croatian language.” A Serbian woman replied: (speaks Serbian) “You mourn your own road.” She really told him off well. There were many such moments…
Later, we fell into many kinds of ambushes trying to supply the school with materials. For example, I remember one time I went to pick up the first class registers and report cards that had come out with the Albanian flag, with the eagle. I filled two sacks with registers, sacks of paper. I didn’t dare get on the bus because someone might check us. I waited there at the underpass on the road to Fushë Kosovë. Then someone shows up, everyone called him spy,
“Spy, spy, that’s him,” people would say. He came with a Lada, with a car, and saw me with the sacks. “Hey professor, what do you have there?” “Newspapers,” I said. “A boy is working in a store and doesn’t have paper to wrap items, I got some newspapers.” “Come on, throw them in the trunk.”
I put them in the trunk, and when we got to Skenderaj, instead of taking me to the apartment, he took me straight to the school. He said, “Come on—I’m not stupid. I know what you have there, but I wanted to do you this favor.” And yet, everyone called him a spy. I owe him thanks for that (laughs). He took me there with those sacks full of registers. Took me to the gymnasium. There were moments like that…
Anita Susuri: I’m curious, about the day you were removed from the schools, how was it? Did the police come or did you leave on your own?
Xhafer Ismaili: We left the job, we left, and then worked in the black. We worked outside of the official buildings. No, they didn’t allow us into the facilities, they blocked the premises. No one was allowed into the school buildings.
Anita Susuri: Was the police in the schools?
Xhafer Ismaili: The police, yes, the police. We weren’t even allowed in the school yard anymore. That was strictly forbidden by them. We tried several times, we made attempts to enter, many times. Not just once, dozens of times we tried to go in, but we failed because they wouldn’t let us.
Anita Susuri: Did you then take part in any meeting where it was decided which house to go to or how to continue working?
Xhafer Ismaili: Yes, there, Lashi made a very big contribution. They had their units in all the municipalities, and each municipality organized itself. We even had a man named Xhafer Murtezi, he was a very good organizer of the work. We would make plans about where to go, into the villages, into people’s houses. The homes, the families, not only did they give us their spaces, but they also gave us moral support, and even food, because they knew we had nowhere to eat out in the villages. They brought us food, different kinds of food.
They were very supportive, very supportive, especially the two Klinas, I will never forget them. This Klina near Skenderaj… all of them, even Likoc, Zallë, they were very hospitable, they helped us a lot, really helped us a lot. But I ask, “Why aren’t we still that supportive today? Why didn’t we continue to be like that?” We forgot everything, I don’t know why we forgot so quickly. This is one of our incurable syndromes.
Anita Susuri: Do you remember the names or the families, surnames?
Xhafer Ismaili: No, unfortunately I don’t remember the names of those families. Honestly, I don’t remember. But they’re in the books, all those names that I can’t recall are written in books.
Anita Susuri: In how many houses did you work, as you mentioned, in villages?
Xhafer Ismaili: Well, we worked in Likoc, in Rezallë, in Polac, in both Klinas, Upper Klina and Lower Klina, in Çubrel, in Runik of course, in Turiçec. Basically in all the local communities, but often not in the very center of the local communities, because we were blocked there too, but in the villages around the local communities. So, almost all of them. We also used primary schools, because in some places they didn’t block the primary schools. We used the facilities of primary schools where we weren’t blocked.
Anita Susuri: Do you remember which places had the primary schools?
Xhafer Ismaili: Yes, there were Turiçec, Leqinë, Orinikë, Runik, Likovc, Rrezallë.
Anita Susuri: How difficult was it for you to travel during the week through all these schools to make it on time?
Xhafer Ismaili: I said it earlier, the solidarity was very strong, solidarity was on a high level, it helped us a lot. For me, it started when I came from Pristina to go to Turiçec. They used to drive us with private cars. The nephew of the principal, the principal we had at the gymnasium, took us to Turiçec. He brought us back, and right after that, they killed him. Just because he had transported us to Turiçec to teach. They killed a young guy, it was very painful.
Anita Susuri: Has it ever happened to you, surely it did, that the police stopped you somewhere?
Xhafer Ismaili: Yes, they stopped us often, and many times they even tried to strip us of our clothes, to make us naked. But we insisted, saying, “No, take us to the police station. If you want to do something, do it there, not here on the street. You might kill us.” Because they were trying to strip us completely, to take off our clothes. The excuse was they were looking for something on us, in that sense. But we never accepted something like that. We never accepted it.
There were even cases, yes, cases where also Vehbi was beaten badly on the road while returning from school. Word got around, and then there was this Sejdi Koca, a very prominent activist. He came to see Vehbi, who had been beaten by the police. He tried to console him and said, “Vehbi, don’t take it to heart.” Vehbi replied, “It’s my ear that hurts!” (laughs). There were moments like that too, you had to, what could you do?
One time they caught us in Deçan celebrating Republic Day, the 7th of September. They wanted to take us all, to send us to the police. Luckily, I had an ID that said I was born on the 7th of September. I handed them the ID and said, “We’re celebrating my birthday, not Republic Day.” There were cases like that, we had plenty.
Anita Susuri: I’m interested to know about the houses where classes were held. What was their condition? Were they even slightly suitable?
Xhafer Ismaili: Where we had the primary schools, the conditions weren’t that bad, they weren’t. But in the houses, oh yes, the children mostly sat on blocks, construction blocks. The villagers helped us, they made some chairs, some other things. They helped us a lot. They helped us a lot, without hesitation. The conditions were difficult, very difficult, but the willpower was great.
Actually, what I see, some so-called pedagogues {he makes air quotes} say, “Why do people say back then the work was better than now?” It wasn’t better than now, but the enthusiasm was greater, the will was stronger. Even if we wanted to work better than now, we couldn’t, because we didn’t have the conditions. Although even now, many of the conditions we have are fake. Fake because we’re trying to imitate others, and we don’t know how, because we don’t have the means to imitate others.
Now they’re calling it full-day school. There’s no such thing as full-day teaching, it’s full-day presence in school. Presence, yes, but not full-day teaching. We will not have favorable conditions for such work. But maybe, since it has started, something will develop.
Anita Susuri: Were there many classes scattered across different homes?
Xhafer Ismaili: We did have that. The gymnasium had, at the time, 2,000 students, more than 2,000 students, there were a lot. I even remember one case where our students were beaten. There was a case where our director fell from a cherry tree, he was pruning it, and had to go to the hospital. We were left as his deputies, and sometimes even the deputy director wasn’t there, so the pedagogues had to take care of things.
They brought me a student who had been beaten by the police. He had been beaten in Ribizla. Ribizla is where we used to send the students. He had come out as a striker, and the other students were singing his praises. A policeman came over and beat him, some guy named Zoran, a policeman from Istog. Then a school employee came, because the students had come just as they were, with the tools they had been working with, and stood in front of the door. A Bosniak employee came and said, “Demonstration, demonstration,” he addressed me. I said, “No, there’s no demonstration.” “Look, the students have come.”
I went out. “What happened?” They told me what happened. Just two or three days earlier, they had also beaten another student. But the student they beat then was from Vojnik, a cousin of the Committee Chairman, Musa Draga, a very strong and good man. He was the Chairman of the Committee at that time, and a very good man. He stood up for us and we were saved from many bad things at the municipal level. I called the Chairman of the Committee.
Since I was close to him, and since they had beaten his cousin, I thought he would support us a bit. So bravely I said, “Comrade Chairman,” back then it was comrade, “they’ve beaten another student. If you don’t do something about this, tomorrow I’ll take 2,000 students to the streets in protest.” He didn’t say a word, just hung up the phone. But not even 15 minutes passed and the chief of police arrived. He had sent the chief of police. Some guy named Avdi Behrami. I’m grateful to him for that. He came and said, “Where are those students?” I was fired up, talking a lot, but he was very calm.
He said, “Alright, let that student who was beaten come to the office, and the rest can go home.” So we went to the office, and he took the student’s statement. When the student said, “I came out as a striker,” he replied, “What striker? When he hit you, you should’ve hit him back.” I thought, “This guy is trying to provoke us, surely he wants to provoke something,” but no. He said, “Alright, you go.” Then he turned to me and said, “What kind of language did you use with the Committee Chairman?” I said, “I’ll tell you the same thing, I told him, and I’m telling you, if you don’t do something, on Monday,” it was Saturday, “I’ll take 2,000 students to the street.”
He slammed the table and said, “Vallahi, you’re not going.” I said, “I am going.” Just me and him in the office. Then he said, “You’re not going because that policeman will be suspended tonight,” and that’s exactly what happened. That night, they punished the policeman, and it cost him a lot. He was suspended. But that’s unforgettable. That policeman from Istog was really bad, he had tortured a lot of people in Skenderaj.
Anita Susuri: Did it ever happen that a police patrol passed by there on purpose or even entered?
Xhafer Ismaili: No, I don’t remember any patrol entering, but passing by, yes, they passed by there. They passed by, and they were often very insulting. Often they even threw insults at us. When we held a lesson that didn’t last long, they would say, (speaks in Serbian at 18:51) “What kind of lesson is that? You must’ve held a meeting, lessons last longer, not this short.”
Xhafer Ismaili: That’s why I often asked the teachers to try to hold the lessons the same way we held them in the school buildings, but it was impossible without reducing them a bit. Honestly, we also didn’t dare to stay too late there during the afternoon shift, we couldn’t keep the students out too long because they were afraid to return home…
Anita Susuri: How long did one class period last?
Xhafer Ismaili: Well, not more than 30 minutes. We didn’t have the possibility, not 35, not 40 minutes. It wasn’t possible.
Anita Susuri: And how was, for example, the condition of the students? How did you see it as a teacher? Were they prepared for learning? How did they experience it, for example? What was your perspective?
Xhafer Ismaili: Well, the teachers, the teaching staff, had never been more vigilant, because they had to be. Because besides teaching, we had to be careful with the children, the students, with what might happen to them on the road. The son of Adem Jashari was a student of ours at that time. Back then, he would come armed, and we had to be careful with his weapon, Fitim. There was no one like that boy, they killed him. There was no one like that boy. Brave, handsome, and a good student. They killed him too. We had to be careful with them. Especially careful with the Jashari family’s children because they were targeted. So…
Anita Susuri: Did they have, for example, enough books? Notebooks?
Xhafer Ismaili: They weren’t without books, they were provided with textbooks. We weren’t lacking textbooks. The textbooks, only those who didn’t want to get them didn’t have them. There was a bookstore; they had textbooks. Only in rare cases did we have subjects without textbooks. For example, psychology, I was both the school’s pedagogue and taught psychology. The teacher had to take the initiative to find textbooks.
I came to Pristina and asked Professor Neki. Neki Juniku was the author of that psychology book, and Professor Pajazit. They gave us several copies free of charge, without compensation, and I photocopied them and gave them to the students. The teacher had to take care of supplying the textbooks, and they did. They did it with pleasure, without hesitation. Because it was that time, we didn’t just do it for the students; we also did it to defy them. To show them that even under occupation, we know how to live, how to learn, how to work.
Anita Susuri: Was there ever a problem that came up, either from the students or from the teachers? How did you manage to resolve it?
Xhafer Ismaili: You’re asking the questions as if we’ve talked before (laughs). There’s one case I’ll tell you about now. Serbian students fought with Albanian students in Runik. That class in Runik had Serbs. They sent Vahide Hoxha, Fadil Hoxha’s wife, as an activist [to take care of] the incident that had happened there. That woman was a lady, an incomparable woman. A woman like [Madeleine] Albright. She came, and then they started. There were communists there who, when something like that happened, liked to act holier than the Pope, acting like they cared so much about Serbs, showing how much they cared.
They would get up and talk. “What happened? This doesn’t happen anywhere else! How could they beat Serbs? How could they do that? We can’t even beat a Serbian dog, we need to behave, we need to act like this.” We were stuck there for almost half the night. Then I spoke. I said, “What happened here often happens even among Albanians; they fight. It didn’t happen with any kind of agenda. It didn’t happen because they were Serbs and we were Albanians. It happened purely by chance. We can try to give it whatever meaning we want, but it has no political color, no ethnic hatred, nothing.”
The meeting ended, and then we went out with Vahide and two professors; one, the physics teacher Rrustem Sejdiu, may he rest in peace, and the other was Avdyl Miftari, both of them have passed away now. We took Vahide. There was still a café open, we went in for coffee and talked with Vahide. She said, “You got us out of a crisis. Morning would’ve caught us there if you hadn’t spoken.” I said, “Yes, I got us out of the crisis.” So we kept talking. I wanted to continue. Avdyl Miftari, the history teacher, said, “Comrade Vahide,” he said, “This Xhafer wants to stay here all night because he has nowhere else to go, no apartment, no nothing.” She looked at me and said, “You don’t have an apartment?” I said, “No, I don’t.” She said, “You’ll have one.” Her intervention went to Musli Draga and he gave me an apartment. She was very, very capable. She was glad that I managed to wrap that up. It had to be closed like that.
We had other cases, sometimes students, due to the teacher’s negligence, would get upset and leave the class. Well, in Runik something like that happened. There was a female teacher, and she had unintentionally said, “Today we don’t have anything on Naim [Frashëri].” Maybe what she meant was, “Not today,” but as the students put it: “There’s no more Naim, no more Migjeni,” and they walked out.
She had a brother who was a physics teacher, and he came and said, “They walked out on my sister’s class.” I went out, gathered the students and said, “No one is allowed to remove Filip Shiroka, Ndre Mjeda, Migjeni, or any other Albanian author from our curriculum. But your teacher, your professor, said, ‘Today we don’t have them. Today’s lesson is something else, not about them.’ And you understood it as if we never have anything on them again.” The students went back inside; things settled down.
As the school’s pedagogue, I had many such incidents. Once, the son of a teacher who worked there came into the hallway holding a knife. He told his homeroom teacher, “You go in front since you’re the homeroom teacher.” He replied, “No, more. His father is here, let his father go in front.” He said, “I don’t dare. He’s used to slaughtering sheep, he’ll cut my throat too.” I walked straight up to him and said, “Will you give me that knife?”
He, in a very loud voice, said, “Yes.” And I thought, he must really want to hand it to me. So he turned the blade away from himself, the handle toward me, and handed me the knife. There were many interesting incidents, very interesting. As a pedagogue, I had…
A friend of my brother’s came once with an iron rod, he was known, a certain Imer, known as a former boxer and very dangerous. He came, upset because he thought my brother had beaten up his son. He came with that iron rod and they told me, “Imer has come, and also this teacher. He says he won’t leave without drawing blood because they beat up his son.”
I went out and said, “Hey Imer!” He said, “Go ahead!” I told him, “You should carry a wooden stick instead, because if someone takes it from you and beats you with it, it’ll hurt less. But with this thing…” He started laughing. “By God,” he said, “you calmed me down, I came here raging, but your words calmed me.” He turned and went back home. There were plenty of cases like that.
Anita Susuri: I’m also interested, and this is a heavy topic, about the poisoning of students. Did that happen? What did you witness?
Xhafer Ismaili: Not only was it a serious matter, but what hurt us the most was that there were still people who didn’t believe it. I had an employee there who used to say, “No, they’re just faking it, they’re acting.” “No,” I said, “they’re not acting.” But not long after, his own daughter got sick. I said, “Is your daughter acting now?” It wasn’t acting, it was poisoning, serious poisoning. Teachers’ cars were constantly being used to transport students to the hospital. My own car never stopped, it was always taking kids to the hospital. That was terrible. It was really terrible. It happened, in our case, I think it happened the most in Skenderaj. Skenderaj had the highest number of poisoning cases.
Anita Susuri: Do you remember the first time you saw a case?
Xhafer Ismaili: Yes, the first time… the first time we thought maybe it was some kind of chemical poisoning. We even asked if that girl had maybe been in a lab somewhere, maybe in the chemistry cabinet? But no, no. By the second or third time, the cases started increasing rapidly, there were so many!
Anita Susuri: What symptoms did they have?
Xhafer Ismaili: The main symptom was breathing difficulty, they had suffocation. They… they couldn’t breathe. Those movements they would make with their legs and arms were horrible to watch. You couldn’t restrain them, you couldn’t calm them down, you couldn’t stop those movements of the arms and legs. It was truly, truly terrible. [We give] thanks to the teaching staff, who were very careful. No one spared anything, cars, effort, everyone was ready. As soon as a poisoning case occurred, we immediately took them to the hospital.
But even the hospital didn’t know what diagnosis to give, they had their own problems. However, just getting them to the hospital would somewhat calm the students, because they felt, “I’m in the hospital, I’m with the doctor.” That, to some extent, helped calm them. That’s how it was, really. These were very distressing events…
Anita Susuri: Were there many cases? Were there more girls or boys?
Xhafer Ismaili: More girls, interestingly, more girls. But also, the number of girls was higher in the gymnasium compared to boys. But mainly, girls were more sensitive to this poisoning.
Anita Susuri: Did you personally see anything suspicious, or someone suspicious passing by who might’ve done it?
Xhafer Ismaili: No. That’s exactly it. The biggest problem was that you had no one to turn to, no one to say anything to, no one to bring to justice for what had happened. That was the biggest issue. Because, if somehow… There had been a lot of prior preparation, before this happened, there were many preparations made. It was all very mysterious, it remains mysterious even today, but there was poisoning.
Anita Susuri: Do you know if, for example, the hospital made any samples or sent anything for testing?
Xhafer Ismaili: I don’t have, I don’t have any information that the doctors or the hospitals undertook anything like that. No.
Anita Susuri: How long did that period last, meaning the one where they were getting sick frequently?
Xhafer Ismaili: Fortunately, it didn’t last long. Fortunately, it didn’t last long. Maybe a month, maybe less, maybe more, but it didn’t last. Because…
Anita Susuri: How did you feel, for example, as a pedagogue, as their teacher?
Xhafer Ismaili: It’s indescribable how we felt. They were our children. They were more than our children, they were ours and yet not ours. There was an even greater responsibility because they weren’t just our own. You felt a greater responsibility toward their parents. There were parents who only had that one child, an only daughter or an only son. When you saw them in that condition, it was truly horrifying.
Anita Susuri: How much could the lessons even go on normally in those conditions?
Xhafer Ismaili: The teaching process was disrupted, it was completely disrupted. Because even those children who weren’t directly affected by the poisoning couldn’t concentrate on learning anymore. They were preoccupied with the fear of being poisoned; they were worried about their classmates and friends who they saw in that condition. There was no longer a learning environment, neither for the teachers nor for the students. That was the enemy’s goal, to cause this, and they succeeded.
Anita Susuri: Did you visit them afterwards? How long did it take for them to stabilize?
Xhafer Ismaili: They would come on their own, inform us that they were feeling better. The students were very good. They would come themselves to let us know they were doing better.
Anita Susuri: Did they return quickly to school or did they need more time?
Xhafer Ismaili: They returned to class, they didn’t take long, they came back quickly. And the parents thanked us for the care we gave them.
Anita Susuri: You mentioned that in ‘96 you also started at the Faculty of Education…
Xhafer Ismaili: In ‘96 I was working both there and there, since ‘96.
Anita Susuri: You told me it was a bit difficult for you, but did you often have to come during the week to Pristina and return to Skenderaj?
Xhafer Ismaili: But we had the schedule, we had the schedule. I felt bad about leaving there, I felt bad. And I also felt bad writing the title there “doctor.” What would I write there? I felt bad telling them I was leaving, because I felt nostalgia. I had spent two years in Turiçec and nearly 27 years there. So that day when I told them, “I’m taking the salary,” it was about that secondary and primary salary if you worked in one place. It was better to take the primary one because it was a better wage. But I was receiving the secondary one. At one point I was overwhelmed with work here, I was burdened with some programs…
Anita Susuri: In Pristina?
Xhafer Ismaili: In Pristina. And I had to go tell them, “I’m no longer working here.” It was a very emotional case. Truly emotional, because already in ‘76, ‘77, ‘78 they [from the university] had come to get me as an assistant and I didn’t go. Because my father was still alive and he was sick. I didn’t want to leave. Only by ‘96 was it very late. But I went, and I did well. At the faculty I did well. I got along well with colleagues, both at the faculty and at the gymnasium. I did well in Turiçec…
Anita Susuri: And in the gymnasium, you stopped working in ‘96 or later?
Xhafer Ismaili: Not in ‘96.
Anita Susuri: ‘96.
Xhafer Ismaili: No, later. So from ‘96 I was working there and then after two or three years there I stopped.
Anita Susuri: Around the time of the war, just before the war.
Xhafer Ismaili: Yes, yes.